If a man can self-identify as a woman, and a white woman can self-identify as a black woman, and a grown man can self-identify as a baby, then why can’t a man self-identify as an eight-year-old-girl in his defense case against alleged child porn charges?
Joseph Gobrick (45) of Michigan was caught with child pornography in 2018. At his trial, which is ongoing, Gobrick’s defence is that he identifies as an 8-year-old-girl. Apparently there isn’t a law against underaged minors viewing photographs of nude underaged minors. He’s aiming to be let off the hook by arguing that he’s merely “transageist.”
Why not? He’s every bit a little girl as Bruce Jenner is a woman. What’s good for the gay goose ought to be good for the transgender gander.
Gobrick’s porn collection contained over 50 pornographic images of everything from infants to 5-year-olds, and police were able to identify at least eight victims in those photographs, which typically means they’re friends or relatives of the offender.
Last week, Gobrick claimed in court, “I’ve always been an 8-year-old girl and even my drawings and fantasies, I am always an 8-year-old girl.”
He continued, “Whenever we did this, there are adults having sex with me in an online forum as an eight-year-old,” positioning himself to be a victim of sex-crimes.
Gobrick drew parallels between his plight and the plight of the Jews, saying, “Under the law, Auschwitz was legal,’’ Gobrick said. “What you’re doing here is wrong, just as Auschwitz was.”
The prosecutor noted, “Even during the trial, the defendant continued to draw, talking about raping babies in the Kent County Jail and making other statements about how this is his constitutional right to continue to do so.”
It is unknown if his transageist claims will work in court.
