Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors

The Cost of Purity Politics: Why Sitting Out the Midterms Helps the Agenda You Oppose

Bill Forsyth III

As the midterms draw near, a growing number of conservative Christians are wrestling with a familiar tension. They look at Republican candidates and see compromise, inconsistency, or character flaws. Some conclude that only a pure abolitionist or a candidate who meets the highest personal standards deserves their vote. Others decide to sit it out entirely or cast a protest vote that has no realistic path to victory.

That impulse is understandable. It is also, in the present political reality, self-defeating.

Scripture is clear that God has established civil government for the good of society, to encourage those who do right and restrain those who do evil (Romans 13:1-4). We are commanded to pray for those in authority so that we may “lead a quiet and peaceable life in all godliness and honesty” (1 Timothy 2:1-2). These are not optional preferences. They are part of loving our neighbor and seeking the good of the place where God has put us.

On the great moral questions of our day (the protection of unborn life, the God-given reality of male and female, the chemical and surgical mutilation of children under the banner of “gender-affirming care,” the definition of marriage, secure borders, and the freedom of the church to speak and live according to Scripture), the two major parties are not equally distant from biblical truth.

The Democratic Party, as it presently stands and as its progressive and Democratic Socialist wings increasingly dominate it, has publicly committed itself to policies that treat these biblical goods as obstacles to be removed. Unrestricted abortion, the redefinition of sex and marriage, irreversible medical interventions on confused minors, weakened border enforcement, and the use of government power against political opponents are not fringe positions. They are mainstream within that party’s current leadership and platform.

A related and under-discussed reality is the growing influence of political Islam within parts of that same coalition. Islam is not merely another unbiblical religion. Its classical political and legal aim is the establishment of Sharia, a comprehensive system fundamentally opposed to religious liberty, the equal standing of women, the protection of Jews and Christians as free citizens, and the separation of civil authority from religious law. Many progressive and socialist activists appear not to grasp the long-term implications of empowering voices that openly seek this outcome. Christians who care about a quiet and peaceable life in godliness cannot afford to ignore it.

Republican candidates are often imperfect. Some are inconsistent. Some disappoint on secondary issues. Some lack the character we would desire in a church leader. The Bible does not require us to pretend otherwise. Yet on the core moral issues just named, Republican candidates and platforms remain measurably closer to the moral law than the alternative. In a two-party system, a non-vote, a pure write-in, or a vote for a candidate with no realistic chance of winning does not create a third option. It simply reduces the total for the candidate nearer to biblical priorities and makes the more radical alternative more likely to prevail.

Some treat every imperfect Republican as essentially the same as a progressive Democrat. That conclusion may feel principled, but it is not accurate. The practical fruit of that stance is the advancement of the very agenda we rightly oppose. We are not asked to baptize a party or to overlook real failures. We are asked to act as citizens who restrain evil and promote what is good, as far as the Lord gives opportunity in the system He has ordered.

Elections are not merely about the personal virtues or flaws of individual candidates. They determine which party’s broader agenda, judicial appointments, regulatory priorities, and institutional power will shape public life for years to come. When the Democratic Party, as it is presently constituted, gains control, the full apparatus that accompanies it advances policies that undermine the protection of unborn life, the biblical understanding of sex and marriage, the safeguarding of children from irreversible harm, secure borders, religious liberty, and equal justice under law. That is the ecosystem that arrives with their victories.

Christians who care about these things should vote accordingly. Support the candidates and measures that will most effectively restrain that agenda. Then continue to pray for and hold accountable whoever is elected. The Lord has given us this means of seeking the public good. We must not squander it through a purity that, in practice, hands power to those who openly oppose the moral law of God.

May the Lord grant His people wisdom and courage in these days.