So God created man in his own image, in the image of God he created him; male and female he created them. – Genesis 1:27
The Holy Spirit wrote that through the hands of Moses. God created man in his own image, in the image of God he created him… The Bible is God’s revelation of himself, and he has revealed himself as the male gender. This is not a human construct; this is the revelation constructed in the mind of God. Maleness is how God self-identifies. Of course, God the Father (another self-identification of God) does not have a body, and is Spirit (John 4:24), but the lack of physical flesh for the First Person of Trinity doesn’t mean God lacks a gender. For in fact, God ascribes to himself gender.
However, the Reverend Rachel (there’s your first problem) Treweek insists on avoiding gender-specific language when referencing the Almighty. A bishop in the Church of England in Gloucester – who happens to be the first female bishop to sit in the House of Commons – says that God should not be referred to as “he.” She says, “We’re told that God created human beings in God’s likeness… If I am made in the image of God, then God is not to be seen as male. God is God.”
Again, the Scripture reveals the male pronoun for God. That women are made in the Imago Dei, as are men, does not imply that God is a female. Likewise, white people, black people, and brown people who are Imago Dei, but that does not imply that God is white, black or brown. Midgets are Imago Dei, but that does not mean God is a midget. Physically or mentally disabled people are made in the Imago Dei, but that does not mean that God is physically or mentally disabled.
However,וַיִּבְרָא אֱלֹהִים אֶת־הָֽאָדָם בְּצַלְמֹו בְּצֶלֶם אֱלֹהִים בָּרָא אֹתֹו זָכָר וּנְקֵבָה בָּרָא אֹתָֽם ׃ does say – explicitly so – that God is a he and a him.
Treweek says that even she has a problem remembering to use gender-inclusive pronouns for God, saying, “Sometimes I lapse, but I try not to. I am not in the business of wanting to offend anyone, but I do want to gently challenge people.” Treweek seems unconcerned about offending God, who she believes is a morphoditic blob.
If you think the upper-ups in the Church of England would be disappointed with Treweek’s departure from orthodoxy, rest assured that they are not. Reverend Miranda Threlfall-Holmes, vicar of Belmont and Pittington in Durham, said, “Recently the Church has been concentrating so much on whether we should have women bishops, we took our eye off the ball about God. Theologians have always argued that God is neither male nor female. We are created in God’s image. God doesn’t have a gender – God is beyond gender.”
Of course, no. Theologians have not always argued that God is without gender. That is patently absurd, historically.
“We don’t have a non-gendered pronoun to use to refer to God here,” Threlhall said, “but in some other countries they don’t have that problem – in Sweden they don’t have male or female pronouns. Our pronouns and our language really do affect what we believe. I’m pleased that Rachel is using her position to make these points. I’d quite like to see some male bishops do so, too – I am sure they would agree with her.”
Of course, the question isn’t if other countries have such a thing as a gender-specific pronoun, the question is if God has a gender-specific pronoun. And because the Bible was written in a language with gender-specific pronouns, we can rest assured that God has revealed himself as he, him, and Father. However, Trelhall is very wrong about Sweden not having a way to pronounce gender. In Swedish, the male pronoun is han and the female pronoun is hon. What has most likely confused Threlhall is that feminists in Sweden have only recently proposed a gender-neutral pronoun, hen (which is pretty funny, because in English that’s the name of a female chicken).
In Swedish, Genesis 1:27 reads, “Och Gud skapade människan till sin avbild, till Guds avbild skapade han henne, till man och kvinna skapade han dem” (emphasis ours). You might notice the Swedish male pronoun in bold.
You can read about the politically correct lunacy here.
A CALL TO ACTION
Bringing you discernment news and commentary from a biblical, polemical perspective means it is tough out there on social media. We’re constantly getting kneecapped and constrained by tech companies who find our fidelity to the scripture and pursuit of truth to be intolerable, resulting in our reach being severely throttled.
For this reason, we ask you please consider supporting us a few different ways. The first, by liking and following our new Facebook page, our home where we share new posts and interact with our members. The second, by following and retweeting our Twitter page. The third, by signing up for our newsletter below.
And last, through direct support. You can catch our free weekly episodes of the Polemics Report by subscribing at BTWN. If you like what you hear and desire to hear more, you can get the VIP full-length version for only $5.95 per month on Patreon. Also, you get other freebies for additional monthly pledges.
Subscribe to us on Patreon here and support our ministry.
Stay informed. Subscribe Today.
When you subscribe, please add firstname.lastname@example.org to your contacts to ensure that your newsletter doesn’t go into your spam folder.
Enter your email address below…