Wicked Ruth Bader Ginsburg Says, “A Woman who Terminates Pregnancy Was not a ‘Mother.'”

Ruth Bader Ginsburg, a wicked, wicked woman

Medical science doesn’t matter to leftists, at least when it comes to biology. While they may cite the latest climate change myths from meteorological weather-guessers, they refuse to deal with factual matters of human biology. Ruth Bader Ginsburg, a wicked womans whose life on this earth will thankfully soon be over, recently rebuked Justice Clarence Thomas for using the term, ‘mother,’ to refer to pregnant women.

Thomas had published a concurring opinion with the court when it ruled on an Indiana law that required abortion facilities to properly “dispose” of murdered infants by burial or cremation (the court upheld that part of the bill). Thomas, a conservative, used the word, ‘mother,’ in reference to women who choose to murder their child (which makes sense, because if you’re a woman who has a child, you’re a mother by definition).

Thomas’ opinion basically begged his colleagues to pick up the topic of abortion, saying that, “the court declines to wade into these issues today, [but] we cannot avoid them forever.” It was this line, however, which so sorely vexed Ginsburg:

[Speaking of the Sex-Selective and Disability Abortion Ban] “…that the mother is seeking the abortion solely because of the child’s race, sex, diagnosis of Down syndrome, disability, or related characteristics,” he wrote in his opinion.”

Ginsburg gave a dissenting opinion to the ruling in which she provided a scathing footnote underneath Thomas’ words. Ginsburg wrote…

“A woman who exercises her constitutionally protected right to terminate a pregnancy is not a ‘mother’…

Uh, but…science and stuff.

If you’re pregnant, you’re a…you’re a (say it with me)…you’re a m-mo….(say it with me)…mother.

Ginsburg didn’t want to decide the matter at all, knowing that because of President Donald J. Trump’s recent appointments, the liberals on the court are outnumbered. Ginsburg argued, “[We should not] take up a case simply to say we are bound by a party’s ‘strategic litigation choice’ to invoke rational-basis review alone.”

Thomas said in response, “It is not a ‘waste’ of our resources to summarily reverse an incorrect decision that created a Circuit split.”

Even though the court is split with five conservatives and four liberals, two of Ginsburg liberal allies agreed with the majority that Indiana had the right to determine how infant bodies should be disposed of. The ultimate vote tally on that subject was 7-2.

In the meantime, we pray that liberals soon get a good grasp of both basic medical science and the use of words. When they do, abortion will be banned for good.



A CALL TO ACTION

Bringing you discernment news and commentary from a biblical, polemical perspective means it is tough out there on social media. We’re constantly getting kneecapped and constrained by tech companies who find our fidelity to the scripture and pursuit of truth to be intolerable, resulting in our reach being severely throttled.

For this reason, we ask you please consider supporting us a few different ways. The first, by liking and following our new Facebook page, our home where we share new posts and interact with our members. The second, by following and retweeting our Twitter page. The third, by signing up for our newsletter below.

And last, through direct support. You can catch our free weekly episodes of the Polemics Report by subscribing at BTWN. If you like what you hear and desire to hear more, you can get the VIP full-length version for only $5.95 per month on Patreon. Also, you get other freebies for additional monthly pledges.

Subscribe to us on Patreon here and support our ministry.

God bless!


***
Stay informed. Subscribe Today.

When you subscribe, please add newsletter@pulpitandpen.org to your contacts to ensure that your newsletter doesn’t go into your spam folder.

Enter your email address below…



Contact Us Donate

Facebook Comments