Pulpit & Pen called your attention last week to the situation at the child sacrifice center in Norman, OK, where the city’s police department has, in a very real de facto sense, renounced the oaths they have taken to uphold the Constitution and the rule of law and to protect and serve the innocent.
Multiple readers contacted Norman PD to complain that the department allows their officers to accept off-duty assignments to provide security services at the baby-murder mill, paid for in blood money from the hand of the serial murderer himself, Larry Burns. We reproduce here a written response from Norman PD about that blog article:
Forward: Here Is a Statement from the Norman Police Dept. about your Blog:
We do have officers who have secondary employment at the business spotlighted in this article. This business is operating in accordance with state and federal law. Our job and the oath all officers take does not allow us the freedom to pick and choose which lives we protect. Whether individuals share the same beliefs or not, we are obligated to protect those who feel threatened. Our role in this case is to protect lives and property and keep the peace as provided by law. This obligation, under the law, is neutral and objective. Please let us know if you have any further questions.
As if that weren’t bad enough, the situation has actually worsened. Later in the week, abolitionist sidewalk counselors observed police officers
- warmly welcoming and shaking hands with the abortionist and his wife (who assists him in his serial murder)
- holding a visible police presence in official (taxpayer-provided) police vehicles with standard markings
- escorting abortive customers from their car to the doors of the abortion mill and then
- escorting them from the door of the mill back to their car
Obviously, these official claims to neutrality and objectivity are bogus and false. But wait! There’s more!
You see, a police officer’s secondary employment has absolutely nothing to do with obligations under the law. Contrary to the implication of the department’s communiqué, no officer is obligated to moonlight in his police uniform. Of course, some law enforcement officers take second jobs directing traffic during rush hour at office buildings or church buildings or run security at movie theaters, yet here they are acting like it is their official sworn duty to moonlight for the child sacrifice center. Further, they are acting as if they have no right to exercise discretion when it comes to where their marked police cruisers are driven and what their officers actually do while driving those cruisers and wearing the uniform though off-duty.
This author inquired about this matter to the Norman PD. Their principal answer was that if they approve officers’ requests to run security at private businesses like movie theaters when they are off-duty, they cannot discriminate against other legal businesses when they request an off-duty police presence. This attitude seems to be shared by the Tulsa Police Department, where no less than a captain frequently provides visible security and assuages consciences with the best of the deathscorts in front of the Tulsa child sacrifice center. Yet in a previous phone call to Norman PD, which this author tried and failed to record, an exception was stated – an officer would not be allowed to work security at a place like a bar, where a conflict of interest could easily arise, in the case for example where a minor attempted to buy alcohol.
Conflict of interest, eh? You mean like when the police are supposed to protect and serve the innocent and uphold the Constitution, and yet are held under lesser laws to NOT protect the innocent when those innocents are still in the wombs of their mothers?
But no, that’s not a conflict of interest, because the lesser magistrates are violating the Constitution and worse, the law of God, by declaring it legal to murder children. It is not a conflict of interest because Norman PD hath declared, defined, and proclaimed thus.
Around timestamp 3:50, the police lieutenant on the phone says, “They try not to get into issues such as this one way or the other.” We have news for them – they have indeed taken a side, and that side is against the God of the universe and against the precious tiny humans who are dying in their city every week. They ARE picking and choosing what lives they protect. This official Norman PD statement asserts that the unborn ARE NOT lives that should be protected. These men and women have not learned from the lessons of history. Law enforcement agents used to take money from slaveholders to infiltrate the North, re-kidnap escaped slaves, and forcefully return them to their slavemasters, where their subsequent fate was usually worse than the first. Law enforcement agents complying with the law and often pretending neutrality stood guard at the gates of and inside Auschwitz and Buchenwald. They were “just doing their jobs”. They were “just obeying orders”. History has judged them. God has judged them.
Psalm 1:1-2 – How blessed is the man who does not walk in the counsel of the wicked, nor stand in the path of sinners, nor sit in the seat of scoffers! But his delight is in the law of the LORD, and in His law he meditates day and night.
Psalm 2:1-6 – Why are the nations in an uproar and the peoples devising a vain thing? The kings of the earth take their stand and the rulers take counsel together against the LORD and against His Anointed, saying, “Let us tear their fetters apart and cast away their cords from us!”
He who sits in the heavens laughs; the Lord scoffs at them. Then He will speak to them in His anger and terrify them in His fury, saying, “But as for Me, I have installed My King upon Zion, My holy mountain.”
We are not critiquing them for responding to reports of break-ins or armed incursions at the death mill. Those are illegal and indeed wicked activities, and if we observed them in progress or saw evidence of it after the fact, we would alert the authorities. But this goes further than that they are not obligated to do what they do outside the mill during off-duty hours. They are obligated not to do it, and the department should not support the serial murderer Larry Burns or his enterprise, and should not pretend neutrality. The authorities should be actively hostile to this wicked business operating under the auspices of legality. Let the chips fall where they may. This rebuke certainly goes for Officer Neelon Greenwood.
But the developing situation with Lieutenant Jeff Robertson is more complex and more obviously objectionable.
Last week, this author was pleading for lives on the sidewalk in front of the death mill and trying to live Christianly in a culture that murders babies. Lt. Robertson was busily working against the witness of the Gospel under color of law. Here you can see how that all went down, and how “neutral” and “objective” he is.
Yep, that’s right. Because this author sacrifices sleep, time, comfort, and resources to plead for lives, offer assistance out of my own pocket, proclaim the Gospel, and beseech people to walk with me in repentance, I am “more self-righteous than anybody (he’s) ever met”, “a jerk”, and “out there shaming people”. This from a “neutral” and “objective” uniformed police officer, driving a marked, official police cruiser, serving as the equivalent of an SS guard at a Nazi death camp, berating and slandering a taxpaying citizen under color of law, behind the badge, in an officially approved capacity.
May we all, like this author, beg the God of mercy to cleanse us from all self-righteousness and evil speech and behavior toward others. May it not be true. May we examine ourselves. I invite you to examine me. Here is a long conversation from only two days before at the same child sacrifice center. Here’s another from two months ago. Many more at my YouTube page. Judge for yourselves whether Lt. Robertson’s accusations ring true.
The Norman Police Department, rather than repenting when proven in sin, is doubling down. May the Lord bring them to repentance and, if not, may He destroy them to His glory in His time.
[Contributed by Alan Maricle]